Hi, Robbie! Nice to meet you! By coincidence, I was called Robbie when I was young. I never answered to Bob or Bobby.
I was 29 in 1984, so I was never part of the show's target audience. I've thought about it over the years since, and have come to a few conclusions about why RB appealed to me so much. (My wife, not so much; she tolerates my cartoon fandoms with an eye roll and a smile.
)
I'm a science geek, and have always found light and color a fascinating study. (Were you aware there is a scientific jounal tltled "Color"?) Having a cartoon that used them as a main theme was great!
Because of my science interests, I could interpret thngs like the Color Belt and the Color Console in terms of high technology instead of magic. My keen interest in astronomy and astrophysics let me take clues from the series and movie and develop a more realistic picture of RB's universe. On Katy's old mailing list we had the Rainbowland Science Team, made up of the science geeks who were fans.
I also have a fondness for shows with a cast of teammates. W.i.t.c.h., Winx Club, Trollz, Kim Possible, the Tinker Bell movies, and latest RWBY. Rainbow Brite fits right in there. In contrast, I never cared for the original MLP, or Strawberry Shortcake, or Care Bears, or Moon Dreamers.
Is this new series really Rainbow Brite?
It's a fair comparison, I think, to ask "Are the new Star Trek movies really Star Trek?" The Enterprise is different, but it's the same ship. The actors are different, but the characters are the same. Does that make it something else?
It's a tricky question, and one that each fan has to decide for themselves. This new series feels right to me, but I want to get a few episodes under my belt before deciding.
I think it would be great to have you back on the series. Have you talked to your agent about it?